Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A4A9FA354 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:39:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65073-06 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:39:32 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from asav05.insightbb.com (gateway.insightbb.com [74.128.0.19]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFABF9F9F46 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:39:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from 74-132-148-68.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO mail2.dawninglight.net) ([74.132.148.68]) by asav05.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2006 05:39:27 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAFZEi0VKhJREUGdsb2JhbACNeAEBKg Received: from [127.0.0.1] (umbar [192.168.0.194]) by mail2.dawninglight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E262028B1; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:39:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <458BB5B4.4020209@dawninglight.net> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:38:44 -0500 From: David Blewett User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Blewett CC: Tom Lane , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Switching to XML References: <4579720E.4000707@dawninglight.net> <1165655250.2621.10.camel@josh> <19232.1165689161@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200612100315.47269.peter_e@gmx.net> <27750.1165720745@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4589E464.4050609@dawninglight.net> In-Reply-To: <4589E464.4050609@dawninglight.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200612/168 X-Sequence-Number: 4091 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 David Blewett wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> However, I have no idea what it'll take to get this patch propagated >> into the copies people actually use, so your fix sounds good for the >> short term. > >> regards, tom lane > > > I submitted the patch to gentoo's bugzilla: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158605 > > David Blewett > Hi Tom: There's been a question posted to that bug. Would you mind replying to it? You don't have to create an account there. I can post your reply. David Quoted, leonardop@gentoo.org: "Very interesting. I'd of course love to add a patch like this, however, it seems not so easy to follow. Not that the patch itself is overly complicated, but openjade sources are, let's say, less than ideal. If you or the original author of the patch could comment the changes, specially those in style/primitive.cxx regarding to the protect and protect2 objects, it would help a lot. Also, for future reference, please create your patches as unified diffs when submitting them to resources such as this bugzilla (many other projects encourage this as well). Thanks." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFi7W0Zmlc6wNjtLYRCBUPAJ0X2y99yxnFsike34Vo+JHckPcI6wCfVzdc HuCmC6It6UvVa6a/5Z1QuGU= =fJ3G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----