Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337139FB3BD; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:34:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90040-02; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:34:11 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (sd-2317.dedibox.fr [88.191.17.192]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244D89FB35C; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:34:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5562B9EC; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:38:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.64] (ASte-Genev-Bois-153-1-39-188.w83-200.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.200.89.188]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC51B33B; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:38:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45BFAC0F.9070003@lelarge.info> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:35:27 +0100 From: Guillaume Lelarge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: "May", "can", "might" References: <200701301739.l0UHdQS05488@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200701301739.l0UHdQS05488@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.051 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200701/33 X-Sequence-Number: 4129 Bruce Momjian a écrit : > Standard English uses "may", "can", and "might" in different ways: > > may - permission, "You may borrow my rake." > > can - ability, "I can lift that log." > > might - possibility, "It might rain today." > > Unfortunately, in conversational English, their use is often mixed, as > in, "You may use this variable to do X", when in fact, "can" is a better > choice. Similarly, "It may crash" is better stated, "It might crash". > > I would like to clean up our documentation to consistently use these > words. Objections? > No objections at all... it can only ease translations. > (Who says were obsessive?) :-) > :) -- Guillaume.