Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760B39FB4B6 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:47:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60701-08 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:47:11 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B159FB430 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:47:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from [172.16.0.68] ([89.241.201.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1KJLeMM021996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:21:41 GMT Message-ID: <45DB503A.3010303@postgresql.org> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:47:06 +0000 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Hagander CC: Tom Lane , Tony Caduto , pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Password issue revisited References: <45BCACDB.5050702@007Marketing.com> <200702201449.l1KEn0r21849@momjian.us> <20070220150507.GD11927@svr2.hagander.net> <45DB448A.3040308@amsoftwaredesign.com> <45DB4624.4060800@hagander.net> <18922.1171998826@sss.pgh.pa.us> <45DB48C5.1000103@hagander.net> <45DB4BDF.6070202@postgresql.org> <45DB4CEC.1050005@hagander.net> In-Reply-To: <45DB4CEC.1050005@hagander.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/1078 X-Sequence-Number: 109568 Magnus Hagander wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> Just to make things clear, this wouldn't be about another auth method. >>> Windows has an API to store arbitrary passwords in a "secure way". At >>> least it does in XP+, not sure if it was in 2000. >> Would it really solve Tony's problem though? I'm not familiar with the >> API you're thinking of, but do be useful to us it must be able to give >> the unencrypted passwords back to us, and therefore anything else >> pretending to be us. > > yeah, but it pops up a GUI notification for you. It's what IE uses to > store things like passports. It's also used, IIRC, by the new RDP client > that's available, and a few more. > Did a quick check, and it's XP/2003 only. See > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa302353.aspx. That would break all the non-interactive apps that we recommend using pgpass with to prevent storing passwords in even less secure places. Regards, Dave.