Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF5D9FB566 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:09:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85181-02 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:09:43 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (sd-2317.dedibox.fr [88.191.17.192]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D919FB4FB for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:09:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74308BABC; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.64] (ASte-Genev-Bois-153-1-37-116.w83-200.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.200.27.116]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479122556; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <462E721B.6090202@lelarge.info> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:09:47 +0200 From: Guillaume Lelarge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Conway CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml References: <462B6CEB.4010109@lelarge.info> <1177441048.16415.234.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1177441048.16415.234.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.169 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.354, BAYES_40=-0.185 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200704/28 X-Sequence-Number: 4224 Neil Conway a écrit : > BTW, context diffs (diff -c) are preferred. For SGML patches, unified > diffs (diff -u) are okay as well. > > On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 16:10 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> This patch adds a sentence on monitoring.sgml explaining that >> stats_row_level needs to be enabled if user wants to get last >> vacuum/analyze execution time. > > Why is this so? It sounds more like a bug than a feature to me. > I don't know why it works this way. Perhaps it wasn't the developer's intention but, anyway, actually, it works like that. -- Guillaume.