Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ipMAM-000811-Sd for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:59:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ipMAK-0004ZS-Eq for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:59:12 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ipMAK-0004ZK-73 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:59:12 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ipMAF-0002wA-Bh for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:59:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0090x2RN004643; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 19:59:02 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: "Jonathan S. Katz" cc: Jonathan Buhacoff , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgres.js driver - for Node.js In-reply-to: References: <157851397836.29176.4731594661906491622@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <9a8037ce-1240-6200-4d01-0e33eff058d3@postgresql.org> <0eae77e8-0eb8-6726-bbb6-ae59750031ad@buhacoff.net> Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" message dated "Wed, 08 Jan 2020 19:45:14 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4641.1578531542.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 19:59:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4642.1578531542@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On 1/8/20 7:00 PM, Jonathan Buhacoff wrote: >> I'm wondering if the short list in the documentation [2] could be >> replaced with a link to the corresponding wiki page [1] ? > ... > Also, while scanning the list, I also saw that someone recently added > several drivers that appear to be non-OSS. Yeah, the lack of curation there is exactly why we generally *don't* link to the wiki from the formal docs. We should make more of an effort to transpose vetted info about this topic into the docs, though. > ... I will wait until there is some > consensus before removing the other closed-source ones. Hm. I'd vote against including those in the docs' list, because we can't as-a-community review their quality and suitability. However, I'm not sure that there's anything wrong with having them in the wiki's list as long as they're appropriately marked as not-OSS. regards, tom lane