Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74359FB4F7 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 16:51:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38051-10 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 16:51:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531D09FB4F5 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 16:51:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so153451ugf for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:51:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=CpWIVoJNdmiaYGjgW3nkDpKmB+k0Rt9UulAMkVZ4DgAb24bnJC654iasdwxNWUS8zuaa3SPAW8+nqHfn1DF79zcoh5z3JeTT6KMBBIJ1E6Ed8Z0JfcsgFfr9g5tXFFvLKzsXmKflNTxNZUjgq+kbbyDatT6CHuYVtUtbQnBaV8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=Uzc5QDOoEOwd7bNbnpU+hf/7CzOILw83SxoV+vYZ/N+gUWF7zKm2TeFSdwqy9Am3HyG+v2VtCaK4zoTRI5T5bX4CR+Vqk+7cF0acWSMlSEjhzswslOTPIKfK/8z8aYwmTqlXTAt704W0LhBsu6R7PatuCD3tjORnC4aJikTs1oU= Received: by 10.67.101.8 with SMTP id d8mr6915059ugm.1179345091502; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.33? ( [82.3.78.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 30sm17939366ugf.2007.05.16.12.51.26; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <464B60A7.3070106@enterprisedb.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:51:03 +0100 From: Heikki Linnakangas User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Alvaro Herrera , Chris Browne , pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Autovacuum and XID wraparound References: <20070514011740.GH14860@fetter.org> <23394.1179108400@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1179117269.6047.3.camel@goldbach> <60sl9z6tln.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> <20070514221619.GC8916@alvh.no-ip.org> <857.1179184222@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20070515221347.GT12731@alvh.no-ip.org> <23362.1179292856@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20070516124420.GA4582@alvh.no-ip.org> <464B0E5A.1070807@enterprisedb.com> <6549.1179344646@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <6549.1179344646@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/250 X-Sequence-Number: 2350 Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas writes: >> Now that I think this a bit more, I think CLUSTER should freeze the >> tuples. > > I disagree with that... Ok. Why? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com