X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256D45E46C1
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  7 Aug 2004 22:57:22 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 96192-08
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  8 Aug 2004 01:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C645E4699
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat,  7 Aug 2004 22:57:18 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i781vLSO004679;
	Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:57:22 -0400 (EDT)
To: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Patch for plpgsql.sgml 
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408062146360.25251-200000@emo.org.tr> 
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408062146360.25251-200000@emo.org.tr>
Comments: In-reply-to Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
	message dated "Fri, 06 Aug 2004 21:50:25 +0300"
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:57:21 -0400
Message-ID: <4678.1091930241@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200408/19
X-Sequence-Number: 2479

Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> As Tom has pointed out today, I've began reading the docs. plpgsql.sgml 
> says that PostgreSQL does not support nested transactions. I've removed 
> that part and a small diff is attached.

I've incorporated this in my recent commit.  Thanks.

			regards, tom lane