Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892CB358049
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:24:53 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) id 1SOF8M-0008Ma-W6
	for pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:24:52 +0000
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3SLOaqH004684
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:24:36 -0400 (EDT)
To: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Documentation of underlying functions for statistics views
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:24:36 -0400
Message-ID: <4683.1335648276@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201204/60
X-Sequence-Number: 7314

Currently, some of the per-column entries in monitoring.sgml mention the
underlying stats function; but the coverage is incomplete, and it seems
very cluttering anyway.  I propose that we remove all that and instead
just suggest that people examine the definition of the view if they want
to know the names of the underlying functions.

			regards, tom lane