Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF179FB4A7 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:30:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56684-07-3 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:30:11 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1C29FB5C1 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:30:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6QEUAbI021232; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:30:10 -0700 Message-ID: <46A8B062.7010904@commandprompt.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:32:02 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Glaesemann , "Joshua D. Drake" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Links wrong in docs References: <46A81854.1010606@commandprompt.com> <5AAC03DB-B1BA-43CE-AC6F-3EE9311BF7CC@seespotcode.net> <20070726041314.GF3241@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20070726041314.GF3241@alvh.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.3/3775/Wed Jul 25 22:56:02 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:30:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/16 X-Sequence-Number: 4343 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Michael Glaesemann wrote: >> On Jul 25, 2007, at 22:43 , Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >>> I noticed the other day that if you are viewing the release notes for a >>> particular version that the prev / next links are wrong. E.g., If I am >>> reading 8.1.8 and want to read 8.1.9 I have to hit previous, instead of >>> next. >> I think it's because the releases are listed newest first, so when you hit >> next you're not getting the next release, but the next release notes. While >> perhaps a bit confusing on the individual pages, I still think it's best to >> have the release notes in reverse chronological order. > > Yeah. It is confusing if you _think_ about it, but if you just use it, > it's fine (after all, we've been using it this way for years. I mean > even Joshua used to use it and not notice it was backwards). Well yes and no. I noted that it was confused as soon as I started to use previous and next. I normally don't do that. J > > Probably the only thing you could actually do about it is change the > text in the link so it said "previous release" (resp. "next release") > instead of "next" (resp. "previous"), but I have zero idea what it would > take. It's probably a lot more work than it's worth, if it's possible > at all. > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/