Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3CA9FBA71 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:24:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69907-05 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:24:25 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C789FBA46 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:24:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l95JOQPt012649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:24:26 -0700 Message-ID: <47068FB3.8060701@commandprompt.com> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:25:39 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070924) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Fetter CC: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency References: <200710051922.01797.peter_e@gmx.net> <20071005182650.GD6005@fetter.org> <470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com> <20071005190718.GE6005@fetter.org> <47068DD4.4080505@commandprompt.com> <20071005192152.GF6005@fetter.org> In-Reply-To: <20071005192152.GF6005@fetter.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/4476/Fri Oct 5 02:53:15 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:24:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/9 X-Sequence-Number: 4430 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be >>>>>> reverted. >>>>> That, or (my preference) make the change larger. I think it's >>>>> significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some >>>>> variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name. >>>> I have seen no evidence of this. >>> For evidence, take a look at the "Products" section of the Postgres >>> Weekly News. >> I just read through all products sections in the PostgreSQL weekly news >> from 07-22-07 to 09-30-07. > > Nice job of careful cherry-picking, but I'm not buying it. It is your news David, written in black and white. Feel free to review them yourself and post a counter. I would be interested in anything I missed. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Cheers, > D - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHBo+zATb/zqfZUUQRAt9yAKCKMJGWII3WkFzhBINqRsRs0jrnkgCfc8dE POi/0pATD1IhTYVFdqlCbdo= =xL1Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----