Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdyE-0003Cm-RF for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:40:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdyD-0003pj-Nb for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:40:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdyD-0003pc-Hp for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:40:57 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRdyB-0003kf-FD for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:40:56 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03NFeqHG004748; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:40:53 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut , Bruce Momjian Subject: Re: An XSLT example script In-reply-to: <840b88af-17ef-a5f5-10ba-f8bba5a11513@purtz.de> References: <709d7809-d7f4-8175-47f3-4d131341bba8@purtz.de> <087ce24a-196d-901a-db78-a6c4bbded224@2ndquadrant.com> <20200421190455.GI19613@momjian.us> <9440a5fd-e5cb-1d19-3790-ee93d1a3a7be@2ndquadrant.com> <840b88af-17ef-a5f5-10ba-f8bba5a11513@purtz.de> Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= message dated "Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:16:14 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <4746.1587656452.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:40:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4747.1587656452@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= writes: > On 23.04.20 11:40, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> But I request that the backpatching of this be reverted.  This would >> renumber all the other examples and/or figures, and then it won't be >> clear what future bug reports will refer to.  This issue isn't that >> drastic to make that worth it. > The chapter doesn't contain any other example or figure. Therefore we > shouldn't face any side effect concerning numbering. Those numbers > restart in every chapter for figures, examples, and tables (there is an > additional table in the huge list of tables of this chapter: "Bit String > Functions" after "Bit String Operators"). Yeah, Peter's point would be a good one if there were other
s or s in chapter 9, but there are none today. I personally wouldn't have bothered with back-patching on the grounds of "it's unimportant" ... but now that it's done, I wouldn't revert it, on the same grounds. regards, tom lane