Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB15E2E3043 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:33:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68801-05 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:33:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (sd-2317.dedibox.fr [88.191.17.192]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3552E3038 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:33:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A6610A37; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:33:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.1] (ASte-Genev-Bois-153-1-31-100.w83-112.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.112.77.100]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D4510A36; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:33:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <474D6E2A.3020006@lelarge.info> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:33:30 +0100 From: Guillaume Lelarge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alvaro Herrera CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Something I don't understand on chkpass.sgml References: <474D3DC8.2030506@lelarge.info> <20071128122647.GF5118@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20071128122647.GF5118@alvh.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/100 X-Sequence-Number: 4633 Alvaro Herrera a écrit : > Guillaume Lelarge wrote: >> I'm currently translating chkpass.sgml and I'm having problems with this >> sentence : >> This is currently a stub that does nothing. >> >> According to answers.com, a stub is a "A small software routine placed >> into a program that provides a common function." So the sentence itself >> is understandable but I don't understand what "the stub" refers to in >> this paragraph : the error code routine ? the comparison one ? the cast >> one ? > > The stub is the function that checks the strength of the password. > Currently it is a lone "return 0", so it does not checking at all (it > has been like that for 6 years). > OK, thanks for the information. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com