Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3ABB2E0174; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:02:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72198-03-7; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:02:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31FC2E3ADE; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lATG1RD3000892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:01:28 -0800 Message-ID: <474EE25E.3080304@commandprompt.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:01:34 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Paesold CC: NikhilS , Tom Lane , David Fetter , "Jonah H. Harris" , PostgreSQL Docs , PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules References: <20071128202615.GG24146@fetter.org> <21686.1196283184@sss.pgh.pa.us> <36e682920711281858x9a37039sa104036bf025de41@mail.gmail.com> <20071129031702.GU24146@fetter.org> <2854.1196315753@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20071128224154.06f950c9@commandprompt.com> <474EDAE2.3010705@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <474EDAE2.3010705@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:01:28 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/124 X-Sequence-Number: 4657 Michael Paesold wrote: > NikhilS wrote: >> If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please >> refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning >> >> +1 > > I would also add another sentence about *why* the recommendation was > changed. We have one rule-based setup here, and it has been working > flawlessly for us,... so personally I don't even know the reasons. > Rules are extremely slow in comparisons and not anywhere near as flexible. As I said up post yesterday... they work well in the basic partitioning configuration but anything else they are extremely deficient. Joshua D. Drake > Best Regards > Michael Paesold > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >