Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14D92E30C9 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 02:45:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80086-02 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 02:45:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51032E3088 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 02:45:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.226] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lB66jJAj011428 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:45:22 -0800 Message-ID: <47579A87.8030903@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:45:27 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Alvaro Herrera , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: release notes.. added stefan References: <20071205123745.68fa66da@commandprompt.com> <20071205222514.GE10096@alvh.no-ip.org> <4044.1196918902@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <4044.1196918902@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:45:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/16 X-Sequence-Number: 4684 Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: >> Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> attached > >> Isn't it too verbose? I thought we were moving away with mentioning >> every single change? A single entry to mention psql autocomplete >> improvements should be OK ... > > AFAIR, past practice is that autocompletion fixes don't make the > release notes at all. From what I can tell, he has done quite a few of them which is why I submitted the patch. *shrug* > > It might be worth reminding folks that the release notes do not > exist for the purpose of mentioning contributors. Then why do we mention them at all in the release notes? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake