Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095E42E3CCC; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:40:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13468-02; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:40:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39D22E3BF8; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:40:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.226] (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBDGed3T023741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:40:39 -0800 Message-ID: <47616091.40300@commandprompt.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:40:49 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alvaro Herrera CC: Josh Berkus , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint" References: <20071206220348.GM8451@alvh.no-ip.org> <1197051730.4255.603.camel@ebony.site> <1197058560.6307.1.camel@hannu-laptop> <200712121509.55019.josh@agliodbs.com> <20071213114518.GB5401@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20071213114518.GB5401@alvh.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:40:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/49 X-Sequence-Number: 4717 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> All, >> >> Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in >> the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations. What's *wrong* >> with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it >> for 6 months? > > Is a translator really not able to change 3 words in a week? Come again. > I think it is likely more about being able to reach the translators. The more common ones such as yourself are obvious but others may not be. Either way, I think that the change is valid and we need to do it. Joshua D. Drake