Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF00F2E006E; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:56:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30452-01-2; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:56:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from alexis.jtlnet.com (alexis.jtlnet.com [69.36.9.81]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1862E0060; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:56:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cpe-075-177-177-228.nc.res.rr.com [::ffff:75.177.177.228]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by alexis.jtlnet.com with esmtp; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:55:59 -0400 id 0009BB3F.47FE2A7F.00005874 Message-ID: <47FE2A9F.5030507@dunslane.net> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:56:31 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20071019 Fedora/1.0.9-3.fc6 pango-text SeaMonkey/1.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joshua D. Drake" CC: Tom Lane , Alvaro Herrera , Martin Edlman , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Pg Hackers , Pg Docs Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW References: <47FA034B.7090201@fortech.cz> <162867790804070511y7266c911w370db97a78c3c519@mail.gmail.com> <47FB51C7.6090509@fortech.cz> <20080408132157.GF5290@alvh.no-ip.org> <47FDFB2E.3060503@fortech.cz> <20080410131602.GF4697@alvh.no-ip.org> <1413.1207838725@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080410075109.069e1e9a@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <20080410075109.069e1e9a@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/12 X-Sequence-Number: 4872 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400 > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Alvaro Herrera writes: >> >>> Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of >>> DBD::PgSPI from the PL/Perl manual? >>> >> It seems like a reasonable suggestion to me, since perl database users >> probably already know DBD and don't have to learn something new if >> they go that way. >> >> Possibly the text should be reworded, with the mention of DBD::PgSPI >> put somewhere else or stuck into a or something. >> > > From what I can see on CPAN (unless I am missing something) DBD::PgSPI > hasn't been updated since 2004 and is at version 0.2. > > http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/ > > I think it can safely be removed in entirety from our manuals. > > > +1. It's also GNU licensed, so we can't include it. A clean room BSD licensed implementation would be a nice addition, but it really doesn't buy you much in functionality that you don't already have. cheers andrew