X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332D6329F49 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:46:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48991-06 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:46:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182AF32A1ED for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:46:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8TNk5oJ004923; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:46:05 -0400 (EDT) To: "Thomas F. O'Connell" , Stephan Szabo , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: EXTRACT Clarification In-reply-to: <4195.1096498191@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <20040928222637.L43334@megazone.bigpanda.com> <0E177963-1214-11D9-8537-000D93AE0944@sitening.com> <29367.1096471944@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29A85DE5-122E-11D9-8537-000D93AE0944@sitening.com> <29855.1096474142@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6CFBBB90-1269-11D9-8537-000D93AE0944@sitening.com> <4195.1096498191@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:49:51 -0400" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:46:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4922.1096501564@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/46 X-Sequence-Number: 2565 > The fact that the CREATE INDEX syntax allows for some things that look > like function calls but not for other things that look like function > calls is an annoyance, no doubt about it. I'm not sure how important > it is to fix though. Turns out to be easy to fix in the grammar, so I did it. regards, tom lane