Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1930164FDF1 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:43:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86241-07 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:43:23 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 447F764FD01 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:43:23 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2008 08:43:21 -0000 Received: from gmp-ea-fw-1.sun.com (EHLO dhcp-eesp05-101-200.Finland.Sun.COM) [192.18.1.36] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 26 Nov 2008 09:43:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/QYIIp3NzQ6MAedKqExNscQ8vlsLReq68lUfvrmB +2tGjBxn4z/mUx Message-ID: <492D0C24.2010701@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:43:16 +0200 From: Peter Eisentraut User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-docs Subject: Key word table update for SQL:2008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200811/16 X-Sequence-Number: 5001 I was planning to update the key words table (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-keywords-appendix.html) for SQL:2008 and was wondering whether there is interest in keeping the SQL-92 through SQL:2003 columns. It might look a bit overloaded then. Comments?