Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C1A635275 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:09:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81104-02-9 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:09:18 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from megafon.hr (megafon.hr [213.202.104.5]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319F4635074 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:09:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by megafon.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71377EC015; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:09:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV at megafon.hr Received: from megafon.hr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wljOE9oNUT3u; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.94] (unknown [212.92.194.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mike) by megafon.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D73F25005C; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49D1F9CF.2020004@megafon.hr> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:09:03 +0200 From: Mario Splivalo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alvaro Herrera CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index References: <49CF8FCD.10006@megafon.hr> <20090330154730.GC23023@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20090330154730.GC23023@alvh.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/28 X-Sequence-Number: 5086 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mario Splivalo wrote: >> None of the array functions >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) >> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? >> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. > > Agreed -- please submit a patch. > Sure thing. It will take some time to get along with Docbook, indexing and everything. Mike