Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA395632B5D
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  5 Apr 2009 17:42:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 57910-03 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  5 Apr 2009 17:42:06 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from proxy.hddesign.com (cluster.hddesign.com [216.165.191.36])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807FE632954
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sun,  5 Apr 2009 17:42:10 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (h75-100-71-30.vrnawi.dsl.dynamic.tds.net
	[75.100.71.30]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by proxy.hddesign.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n35KfRD8065487
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:41:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dn@hddesign.com)
Message-ID: <49D9176D.9080307@hddesign.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:41:17 -0500
From: David Niergarth <dn@hddesign.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL formatting in docs
References: <49D8F9CB.4030700@hddesign.com> <28206.1238963848@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <28206.1238963848@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-hddesign-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
X-hddesign-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: dn@hddesign.com
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200904/6
X-Sequence-Number: 5094

Thanks for settling that for me; I've always wondered about it!

--David

Tom Lane wrote:
> David Niergarth <dn@hddesign.com> writes:
>> Hopefully not a naive question... How are all the queries in the 
>> postgres docs formatted? They're all very consistent and nice pretty 
>> printed, especially complex queries. How can I do the same?
> 
> I'm afraid they're all laid out by hand :-(
> 
> 			regards, tom lane