public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Kevin Grittner <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: no universally correct setting for fsync
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 08:47:15 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)

Someone just posted to the -admin list with a database corrupted
while running with fsync=off.  I was all set to refer him to the
documentation explaining why he should stop doing this, but to my
surprise the documentation waffles on the issue way past what I
think is reasonable.
 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-FSYNC
 
There are dire-sounding statements interspersed with:
 
| using fsync results in a performance penalty
 
| Due to the risks involved, there is no universally correct setting
| for fsync.
 
| If you trust your operating system, your hardware, and your
| utility company (or your battery backup), you can consider
| disabling fsync.
 
Isn't this a little too rosy a picture to paint?
 
-Kevin

view thread (35+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox