Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FBE6328C4 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:13:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57121-05 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:13:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [129.240.10.57]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1BE6325C9 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:13:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OaQrk-00089O-M7; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:13:00 +0200 Received: from ti0153a380-2012.bb.online.no ([83.108.26.224] helo=[10.1.1.200]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) user rafael (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OaQrk-0006n0-5o; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:13:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4C42D39F.1050608@usit.uio.no> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:12:47 +0200 From: Rafael Martinez User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Atkins CC: pgsql-docs Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams References: <201007100001.o6A01to03428@momjian.us> <4C3973CF.80608@usit.uio.no> <9DCA3CE9-0DF2-4F9B-97A6-3FA538A949FB@blighty.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 5 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 5 sum msgs/h 2 total rcpts 364 max rcpts/h 8 ratelimit 0 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-8.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, UIO_PGP_SIGNED=-3, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: 887530BD0A479CD14FF2C346DC9709D96FBFF848 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 83.108.26.224 spam_score: -79 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 2 total 2 max/h 2 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.311 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201007/130 X-Sequence-Number: 5786 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Atkins wrote: > But choosing a > proprietary format that's only supported by a single tool, and > that renders to horrible quality PNGs is something we'll regret, > I think. I think we should keep to the facts and you are not doing it here. Can you explain how you got to the conclusion that dia renders to horrible quality PNGs? Because this not what I and many have experienced when generating PNG files with dia. regards, - -- Rafael Martinez, Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo, Norway PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkxC05sACgkQBhuKQurGihScPQCeKynNzLwvJx4KIrbzJ/+ADDeJ b7IAnA7e4MYA5gOXJ1ip5nTa0Yeou2PX =Onxk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----