Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED5F632946 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:28:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11806-04 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:27:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C2363282C for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:27:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (static-71-179-240-8.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [71.179.240.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LmwP6-1PGKSn2kWq-00h7t9; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:27:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4C47ACA3.7030202@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:27:47 -0400 From: Greg Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Atkins CC: PostgreSQL Performance Subject: Re: Using more tha one index per table References: <4C46A23B.2090606@acteos.com> <4C470B69.6080304@2ndquadrant.com> <4C47953D.9090603@postnewspapers.com.au> <4C4798D5.7030700@emolecules.com> <4C47A341.7010905@2ndquadrant.com> <91A47C2E-2802-4719-BCC6-B82A125DCB70@blighty.com> In-Reply-To: <91A47C2E-2802-4719-BCC6-B82A125DCB70@blighty.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:iJIFQMlaCNFQQbf0LHGBckbNqN9CNmZJEPLBSTXzXKx xMc3dQwcRlfplmzwFkweyvaFfEDdJmC47VFmxipxE/AfHatdeA yGWcojFJIh7a/tJtLcNw4lf6AXHyWJcdvIQsPEFpUOZurJMV75 yZyOC/x0N7SYLoc3+vO8u+Q3uR3mj23i1iB1C9v9h1u9PrfK/k Ilu31fY2sScPxO51oEMvxNvj5j2WeqF/jNFhd8a0ho= X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201007/310 X-Sequence-Number: 39699 Steve Atkins wrote: > If http://postgresql.org/docs/9.0/* were to 302 redirect to http://postgresql.org/docs/current/* while 9.0 is the current release (and similarly for 9.1 and so on) I suspect we'd find many more links to current and fewer links to specific versions after a year or two. > True, but this would leave people with no way to bookmark a permanent link to whatever is the current version, which will represent a regression for how some people want the site to work. Also, this and the idea to add a "this is an old version" note to each old page will end up increasing work for the already overloaded web team managing the site. Neither are unreasonable ideas, there's just some subtle bits to making either happen that would need to be worked out, and I don't know who would have time to work through everything involved. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us