Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AD2633A4E;
	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:23:42 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 38342-10; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:23:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com (mail-pv0-f174.google.com
	[74.125.83.174])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760B563313A;
	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:23:34 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by pvc7 with SMTP id 7so168931pvc.19
	for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
	:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=SVKBGhDfIoqik4ss+hhvls0FCzvcoMot6d80G/9nzQA=;
	b=fyEGyUCmCdfoqG6Pa/Iii7fOZ2HdrHxp4NcLPkfNGdHvXFZhtSOjpjuo0ihdQPRC40
	ASoglkkH6qXtBTAYBupfxeRmpBVtQAQaoOE3U5BAnFlHYMfuyalmTiH0slW/HN93o7cO
	u2FWrdQD1zXjRXXB1wJi2F74cZYGzogrBsQyM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=ERpTJIKrDgF+uK+BOFj5IM+gnnV/HBCQL5+U9GOF6wfrLxAA5HGPwosWi73Vtejdav
	wqOMthLQg2hx8C+hu4iEMeYgi7CYoKh5F3YaLrjeaMwfuu27gEYiBUDjwWq7vroLewdj
	7lH79d2UAwlO8zcG2UPCcWyKg/zjuaCMSgYgs=
Received: by 10.114.12.14 with SMTP id 14mr465160wal.23.1280420605624;
	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.101] (p0245ed.tokyff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [121.2.69.237])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
	d35sm1797565waa.21.2010.07.29.09.23.21
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C51AAFA.7090601@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:23:22 +0900
From: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja;
	rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>,
	Lars Nordin <lars.nordin@gmail.com>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement
References: <4C19E5B9.3040002@gmail.com> <4C359F7B.3020604@gmail.com>
	<4C47E6BF.8020901@gmail.com>
	<201007272142.31334.lars.nordin@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimyUPQE90zbS5e=QTvsZj8aarGYr47no=KV4W5v@mail.gmail.com>
	<27340.1280363314@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20100729084136.GA1016@feivel.credativ.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20100729084136.GA1016@feivel.credativ.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201007/163
X-Sequence-Number: 5819

On 2010/07/29 17:41, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I had a short look at the docs Satoshi-san put online and yes, I'm impressed.
> However, I won't be able to proof read them before September. But given that
> 9.1 development is just starting I see no problem in putting the docs into the
> archive be it cvs or git and improve if there if it really needs improvement.
> In my short check I didn't see anything major that needed to be changed. This
> of course implies that the new docs are available in a suitable format.

Thank you all for your attention to the ecpg document work.

Yes, I see some developers are too busy, so it's difficult to take time
to review such large amount of changes of the doc for now.

I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September
to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest)
by some developers who are interested in this doc.

I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review
and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take
an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period,
and it can be an effective way to merge this large change
if we can take time for such intensive work.

Is this possible? Any suggestions?

Regards,
-- 
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>