Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BE41337B64 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:32:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19566-02 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:32:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A991337B5F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:32:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (static-71-179-240-8.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [71.179.240.8]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MCwZH-1Orujq2NFr-009ZKx; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:32:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA1458F.9030707@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:31:59 -0400 From: Greg Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Satoshi Nagayasu CC: Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual References: <4C4847D0.9030001@gmail.com> <4C602E9D.40501@gmail.com> <4C60C7A9.10307@gmail.com> <4C634586.7090908@gmail.com> <1285502270.1601.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <4CA11FF7.1090403@gmail.com> <4CA13D11.7050905@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA13D11.7050905@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:tImLC8QGG2uzSKwNfniYQorl0Qq0QCrp8tmCI72T7xo 7hgY4uFNrNGTwdGePlPM/mG9l9LRwQFXm++Zv+Rvfk7k2o8ddZ hTBkBXlbVtvYMWZJxrVmwivxLVXeeB5ufVBVz1QbM4PttC6vB6 c+S4OnLGwIqdF5uXocGu+qeTyFlvVftmcBJFjp7wZy3zyYyK5t PwNok2JL2mcylvPpPr26o1kTDV/mnCwH5prI1gTPeg= X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/129 X-Sequence-Number: 6119 Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > Oops, I visited a page describing about the coderepository > from here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/developer/coding I just made a pass through the wiki cleaning up all of the outdated CVS related stuff I knew of there that this page was pointing to. It's a sequential group of 9 changes to revert if we're forsaken and somehow this conversion stops. Main thing left with obsolete info is http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/cvs.html > Yeah, I know the code repository has been moved to Git, > but I believed that Git and anon-cvs are available > since the doc mentions with them both. If the patch you generated applies to the git version of the repo cleanly, you may be fine for now. The anon-cvs version is mainly intended as a source to get a copy of the source code just to compile or read, not to develop patches against. For that it would be better to switch to git when you get some time to spend on that. -- Greg Smith, 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us Author, "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance" Pre-ordering at: https://www.packtpub.com/postgresql-9-0-high-performance/book