Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190AB1337B6F; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:01:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93809-01; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:01:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com (mail-pv0-f174.google.com [74.125.83.174]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27581337B6E; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:01:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: by pvg2 with SMTP id 2so1506406pvg.19 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:01:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8QUB4qnsoqt9JAW5zKqH63bnsuY1NnqPjVO9n1I545w=; b=RytNYTQpjSV5RVoHc1dxZ0pTc0oiayOu6F+j48i5nSzyaTXTBp/1sltSVrrSnK9dKO eJWa1rCXjJzK6SUxfrUHKH5iN72Yvdkh5v+BdyygO9WnAehRyvEcz9QGWcaUbuhkMDYA XT8D+Z2L11tHd3HJ04lPMAcvq/9ozSJ848y34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sNbAavypkhw9f5TufdS1U91SpZaP2gXFheHxiPC+rR9iqjAmC+wUo9wkm6l0/FH1Sf cDCNhdTLuirCje+KzFEpMj6qMUVgtHzeuWLEdc+hMaiH7h2gGyBjnplAPw0Ig++eOQUp trR0IUf6AfYLQZlHOjBNi2b1hZ3tNNuPMFbqk= Received: by 10.114.52.2 with SMTP id z2mr10029976waz.84.1285668109489; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.2.101] (p0245ed.tokyff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [121.2.69.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o17sm12213723wal.21.2010.09.28.03.01.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA1BD10.1010706@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:01:52 +0900 From: Satoshi Nagayasu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Eisentraut CC: Tom Lane , Robert Haas , Michael Meskes , Lars Nordin , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement (re-post) References: <4C19E5B9.3040002@gmail.com> <4C359F7B.3020604@gmail.com> <4C47E6BF.8020901@gmail.com> <201007272142.31334.lars.nordin@gmail.com> <27340.1280363314@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20100729084136.GA1016@feivel.credativ.lan> <4C51AAFA.7090601@gmail.com> <1285511557.1601.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> In-Reply-To: <1285511557.1601.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/136 X-Sequence-Number: 6126 On 2010/09/26 23:32, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2010-07-30 at 01:23 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: >> I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September >> to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest) >> by some developers who are interested in this doc. >> >> I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review >> and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take >> an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period, >> and it can be an effective way to merge this large change >> if we can take time for such intensive work. >> >> Is this possible? Any suggestions? > > If you want this reviewed, please send in a patch of the source code you > changed. Patch is available at here: http://code.google.com/p/ecpgdocs/downloads/detail?name=ecpg-patches.20100928.tgz (I uploaded this to the GoogleCode, because this list did not deliver my previous message with a patch tarball.) The patch is split into total 15 patches for each chapter of the ecpg doc, and every patch could be applied to the Git version with only itself. So you can review every patch chapter by chapter. Thanks in advance. Regards, -- NAGAYASU Satoshi