Received: from mail.retep.org.uk ([216.126.85.184]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f21K3ax84459; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:03:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from peter@retep.org.uk) Received: from heather.retep.org.uk ([193.113.114.7]) (authenticated) by mail.retep.org.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f21K3VR84441; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:03:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from peter@retep.org.uk) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010301200047.0221bd20@mail.retep.org.uk> X-Sender: peter@mail.retep.org.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 20:01:43 +0000 To: Peter Eisentraut From: Peter Mount Subject: Re: Java class documentation Cc: , In-Reply-To: References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010224174419.009f8ba0@mail.retep.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Archive-Number: 200103/1 X-Sequence-Number: 432 At 00:28 25/02/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >Peter Mount writes: > > > Actually I was waiting until 7.1 was out before rewriting the jdbc docs > > >from scratch (so much has changed since those were written). > >I can see that. However, 7.1 users should still get the benefit of >reasonably up to date documentation. I've at least changed all package >references to 'org.postgresql' and said something about ant, plus some >spell checking and polishing. Perhaps you can scan it to make sure it's >not complete garbage. > >http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/jdbc.html Ok, I will do. Sorry for the late reply, it's been a hectic week and its the first time I've had to even use my home machine since Sunday :-( Peter >-- >Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/