X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (developer.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC659B43166 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:56:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13050-05 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:55:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from trill.maridan.net (unknown [217.6.52.210]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65ADB4316A for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:55:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from prog-01.polonium.de ([212.121.156.162]) by trill.maridan.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA31129 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 16:55:52 +0200 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030704165428.00c66238@mail.polonium.de> X-Sender: rafcio@mail.polonium.de X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:55:04 +0200 To: From: Rafal Kedziorski Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL In-Reply-To: <3F05E144.10448.6784AB@localhost> References: <20030704142800.GC4592@libertyrms.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Archive-Number: 200307/69 X-Sequence-Number: 2362 hi, At 20:19 04.07.2003 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: [...] >On a positive note, me and Josh are finishing a bare bone performance article where will be this article published? >that would answer lot of your questions. I am counting on you to provide >valuable feedback. I expect it out tomorrow or on sunday..Josh will confirm >that.. Rafal