public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Lincoln Yeoh <[email protected]>
To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
To: Quinton Lawson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Windows 2000 Slower Than Windows XP (SOLVED)
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:34:44 +0800
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.1.20050123233139.03a3adf8@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <000901c50103$946d2e00$6501a8c0@travis>
	<[email protected]>
	<000901c50103$946d2e00$6501a8c0@travis>

While not an FAQ (yet?) I find it interesting that installing a QoS packet 
scheduler would _improve_ response - (I'm assuming there's no other 
concurrent traffic other than DB traffic).

Anyone know why this would be the case or have any ideas? Might it improve 
performance for other network software as well...

Regards,
Link.

At 11:35 AM 1/23/2005 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:25:30PM -0600, Quinton Lawson wrote:
>
> > By default, Windows XP installs the QoS Packet Scheduler service.  It
> > is not installed by default on Windows 2000.  After I installed QoS
> > Packet Scheduler on the Windows 2000 machine, the latency problem
> > vanished.
>
>Maybe this deserves a FAQ entry or doc note somewhere.

view thread (5+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Windows 2000 Slower Than Windows XP (SOLVED)
  In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.1.20050123233139.03a3adf8@localhost>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox