Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1EQR-0008Bc-0w for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:32:39 +0000 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1EQO-0004ev-ES for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:32:38 +0000 Received: by lbbgj3 with SMTP id gj3so148302lbb.19 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:32:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=QK8W2puXiwxrWq9zdlejxSEKBLjS5eeG9+LWsnkZNCk=; b=IVhm27N6zJWtk+caI3MDfv3TiIADNTPG3Sn3u+OpA4dIYiXI+IezvYMTrc2+0yf9X7 tmYEE95rEPZ49jyP1FHrgNqpJNUkklzfBa2Er+AiT2bkwFntg1YY85j7mVXg2lV8S7VG 1eNA9PDHcQOtrtY9iifjNspSQyRupwUkFl5VKxONPgI3WnB+s0llX3/psOkvZZ6WzvC4 muFgFiHoiWLIkQQkxy0kTiBNQ7rpQgm92Csl2a+mpr9qzl1jPO+BYevufmwqIaTktPqq IZoU+DprVIA2vGqUPjrmeebQb7I2niT+B1/gtvLZ2hChfvOTUCJNQTt9dJbnOSAIEesD rweA== Received: by 10.112.100.7 with SMTP id eu7mr7740870lbb.105.1344940355185; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (dsl-hkibrasgw2-fedadf00-197.dhcp.inet.fi. [80.223.218.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5sm462958lbg.1.2012.08.14.03.32.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 03:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <502A293E.70403@enterprisedb.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:32:30 +0300 From: Heikki Linnakangas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org Subject: Confusion over "This page in other versions" links Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUj3PFB7MUWh+zaA3/cdkCZq/q/hOym4HQPH8owIdADGW0KKgJfAO9ELtgorcY/EEbvU0G X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201208/13 X-Sequence-Number: 7406 I just had a discussion with someone off-list, where he was looking at the documentation page of a contrib module at www.postgresql.org/docs. Looking at the page, he came to the conclusion that the module was no longer supported in 9.2, because the header at the top of the page said: "This page in other versions: 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4 / 8.3 | Unsupported versions: 9.2 / devel" I find the links really helpful, but apparently they can be misunderstood. Perhaps we should change the "Unsupported versions" text to "future versions" or "Development versions". Or change "9.2" to "9.2 (beta)", and remove the "Unsupported versions" text altogether. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com