Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <peter_e@gmx.net>) id 1T2Sln-0006vY-MW
	for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:03:47 +0000
Received: from eisentraut.org ([85.214.91.16] helo=gattler.pezone.net)
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <peter_e@gmx.net>) id 1T2Slk-00023q-5P
	for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:03:47 +0000
Received: from jesse.pezone.net (efw.scs.myyearbook.com [204.145.120.11])
	by gattler.pezone.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52F745A8366;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <502EA39E.4040301@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:03:42 -0400
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
	rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>
CC: Postgres Documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where
	to start?
References: 
 <CAKt_Zfui6MvFezCkgUJ3h56WLjZE4OS66+YNv6b12WdrmvORZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKt_ZfuPkq2J+H0k-BOiGXJqpcP924_tLfz1TiOCHs0v3Eg8fQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKt_ZfuPkq2J+H0k-BOiGXJqpcP924_tLfz1TiOCHs0v3Eg8fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201208/32
X-Sequence-Number: 7425

On 8/15/12 5:33 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> So here is a very rough draft.  I would be interested in feedback as to
> inaccuracies or omissions.  I would like to get the technical side right
> before going into an editorial phase.
>
> Any feedback on the technical side?

[citation needed]

Seriously, if we are trying to justify our use of seemingly standard 
academic terms, we should have some references to where those are 
defined or at least discussed.  Otherwise we are just begging the 
question: PostgreSQL is object-relational because we say so.