Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9FLF-00032k-4G for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 18:31:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9FLE-0003ZI-Gu for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 18:31:04 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9FKq-0002uZ-W8 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 18:30:41 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9FKn-0005aK-Mg for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 18:30:40 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v4CIUZCM005033; Fri, 12 May 2017 14:30:35 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-docs Subject: Re: remove doc/src/sgml/sql.sgml? In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Fri, 12 May 2017 14:23:58 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5031.1494613835.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 14:30:35 -0400 Message-ID: <5032.1494613835@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Peter Eisentraut writes: > doc/src/sgml/sql.sgml hasn't been built as part of the docs since > forever, and it just trips me up on any greps for global changes. Can > we remove it? Looking at the git logs shows that we've spent effort on maintaining it, which is a bit silly if it's unused. We should either remove it, or update it and start including it. I'm not particularly interested in doing work to revive it, so +1 for removing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs