Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VGW7W-0004wu-86 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VGW7V-0007WR-Nk for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:32:49 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VGW7V-0007WG-6W for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:32:49 +0000 Received: from mimolette.dalibo.net ([212.85.154.222]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VGW7Q-0001X6-Ry for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:32:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.43] (gut75-2-82-66-247-92.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.247.92]) by mimolette.dalibo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBCDF4705D9F; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:32:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:32:40 +0200 From: Vik Fearing User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: PG Docs Subject: Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT References: <52244B75.6040507@dalibo.com> <15351.1378133409@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <15351.1378133409@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Vik Fearing writes: >> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit >> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched? >> I think it needs to be. > AFAICS, it was. > > Author: Simon Riggs > Branch: master [073d7cb51] 2013-06-18 12:09:39 +0100 > Branch: REL9_3_STABLE [0ae1bf8c1] 2013-06-18 12:10:10 +0100 > Branch: REL9_2_STABLE [20a562f91] 2013-06-18 12:00:32 +0100 > Branch: REL9_1_STABLE [be039d4b2] 2013-06-18 12:05:48 +0100 That does seem to indicate it was. But it doesn't seem they made it to the website: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html -- Vik -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs