Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:33:37 +0300
Message-ID: <528853D3C5ED2C4AA8990B504BA7FB850106DF14@sol.transas.com>
In-Reply-To: <19332.1205511560@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Thread-Topic: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Thread-Index: AciF7zIgstWzM9H6QpetWspKomVOIQAAVezQ
From: "Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey.Zubkovsky@transas.com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>


The previous results were received on PG 8.3 version:

	"PostgreSQL 8.3.0, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400"


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]=20
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:19 PM
To: Zubkovsky, Sergey
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT

[ moved to -hackers --- see original thread here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-03/msg00039.php
]

"Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey.Zubkovsky@transas.com> writes:
> Here is my example.

Hmm ... on my Fedora machine I get the same result (704512) in
all these cases, which is what I'd expect.  (The exact value
could vary across platforms, of course.)

You said you were using the MinGW build --- maybe MinGW's version
of stat(2) isn't trustworthy?

			regards, tom lane