Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQhL-0001nz-JR for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:02:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQhL-0004Ew-3l for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:02:15 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQhK-0004En-2t for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:02:14 +0000 Received: from hogranch.com ([75.101.82.47]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqQhH-0003TW-Dc for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:02:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (porker [192.168.0.2]) by hogranch.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id rBAH22n26144 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:02:02 -0800 Message-ID: <52A74907.8040400@hogranch.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:01:59 -0800 From: John R Pierce User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) References: <52A5EB31.7070505@nybeta.com> <9F208972-32D3-4295-A30D-BCDAEF139E9F@silentmedia.com> <20131210174738.a530d930b8fd1e972d84f234@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20131210174738.a530d930b8fd1e972d84f234@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HawgScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-HawgScanner: Found to be clean X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org On 12/10/2013 8:47 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote: > Seems to me that the editing process of the different parts of > postgresql.org somewhat lacks transactional semantics. postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork. there's other forks that offer distributed databases, such as greenplum. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general