Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC1bE-0005Ow-R3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 06:41:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC1bE-0005du-3j for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 06:41:12 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC1bC-0005dZ-9h; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 06:41:10 +0000 Received: from mbx.knossos.net.nz ([202.160.48.10]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC1b8-0004mv-3U; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 06:41:09 +0000 Received: from [10.1.1.3] ([121.99.254.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by mbx.knossos.net.nz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s186emeR005110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 8 Feb 2014 19:40:49 +1300 Message-ID: <52F5D170.4000309@archidevsys.co.nz> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:40:48 +1300 From: Gavin Flower Organization: ArchiDevSys User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane , Peter Eisentraut CC: Robert Haas , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.) References: <22438.1391463522@sss.pgh.pa.us> <28834.1391478486@sss.pgh.pa.us> <52F58CE8.4090902@gmx.net> <18083.1391839531@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <18083.1391839531@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 08/02/14 19:05, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> On 2/3/14, 8:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> That's a very fair question. It's a reasonable bet that pretty much >>> nobody actually looks at the text versions of either HISTORY or >>> regress_README anymore. It's conceivable that somebody somewhere makes >>> use of the text version of INSTALL when trying to get PG going on some >>> bare-bones platform ... but really, can't they look it up on the net? >>> How'd they get the PG sources they're installing, anyway? >> I think having an INSTALL file is good form, and it costs us little to >> maintain it. >> The other files could be removed, IMO. > That seems like a reasonable compromise to me. The HISTORY file is > certainly the worst pain-in-the-rear among these, since it's generated > from files that we change constantly, and so we're always tripping over > the link restrictions. > > regards, tom lane > > How about adding URL's for the online versions of HISTORY & README's (or their rough equivalents - perhaps the online version of the latest 'Appendix E. Release Notes' would be sufficient?) to the INSTALL file? Cheers, Gavin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers