X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D67DD1D55E; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:48:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77377-04; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:48:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F69ED1D3FC; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:48:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAKHmA19005374; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:48:11 -0500 (EST) To: Michael Glaesemann Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts? In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Michael Glaesemann message dated "Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:51:13 +0900" Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:48:10 -0500 Message-ID: <5373.1069350490@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/358 X-Sequence-Number: 3005 Michael Glaesemann writes: > Just an idea. I think it's good to have some redundancy in > distinguishing these things. Not only for those without color printers > (poor souls ;) but also for people who have trouble distinguishing > color differences. Yes. I don't have an objection to using color, but it has to be in addition to a font difference, not a substitute for a font difference. regards, tom lane