Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8046321F7 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:14:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31316-01 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:13:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2E6634500 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:13:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7FLDrL7005449; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:13:53 -0400 (EDT) To: Robert Haas cc: Thom Brown , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: pg_dump locking info In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:56:43 -0400" Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:13:53 -0400 Message-ID: <5448.1281906833@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/46 X-Sequence-Number: 5870 Robert Haas writes: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Thom Brown wrote: >> And whilst I was perusing the docs, I also noticed this on >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/backup.html >> >> "Each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Each is discussed in turn below." >> >> That sentence is at the bottom of the page.  It would make sense in a >> PDF, but might be a confusing in section-by-section HTML >> documentation. > I don't find it so, but I suppose if it's a big deal we could change > it to read "in the following sections". Yeah, that's what I was thinking of doing in response to Thom's gripe. regards, tom lane