X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608495E4245 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:01:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71585-03 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 17:01:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2025E3E30 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:01:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i77H1Apa000550; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:01:10 -0400 (EDT) To: David Garamond Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Documenting NULLVALUE() and NONNULLVALUE() In-reply-to: <4114E264.2090709@zara.6.isreserved.com> References: <4114E264.2090709@zara.6.isreserved.com> Comments: In-reply-to David Garamond message dated "Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:08:36 +0700" Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:01:10 -0400 Message-ID: <549.1091898070@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/16 X-Sequence-Number: 2476 David Garamond writes: > Perhaps we can change section 9.1 from "Logical Operators" to "Logical > Functions and Operators"? NULLVALUE() and NONNULLVALUE() can be > documented there, along with IS, IS NULL, and IS NOT NULL (which also > don't seem to have been covered yet in Chapter 9). I don't think we should document nullvalue() and nonnullvalue(), because they are not standard. As for "not covered", IS NULL is documented in 9.2 Comparison Operators. regards, tom lane