Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail
Message-ID: <54d82c8c-12a5-be8e-f340-408c171eb256@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 09:24:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: Add missing meson arguments in docs
Content-Language: en-US
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Jelte Fennema <me@jeltef.nl>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
References: 
 <CAGECzQRXd1z+AoQ4tC5tqPk1_NQJohf6xwdEL=z9KgxHau2maQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y/V2m04KR6A0K29U@paquier.xyz>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y/V2m04KR6A0K29U@paquier.xyz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54d82c8c-12a5-be8e-f340-408c171eb256%40enterprisedb.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 22.02.23 02:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
> -Db_coverage is part of the core options of meson because it is not
> listed in meson_options.txt, no?  Documenting the switch is fine, but
> it seems like we lack contents here.  The paragraph describing
> -Db_coverage links to regress-coverage, still this only has
> instructions for ./configure.  Shouldn't we have some docs to show one
> how to achieve the same with meson?  I'd guess that a separate section
> for meson would make the most sense, for as long as we support both
> methods in parallel.

Yeah, this is just in the long tail of things to work through.