Message-ID: <55676C09.6070506@commandprompt.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:27:05 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch
References: <55665072.9020409@commandprompt.com> <55675B81.8030109@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <55675B81.8030109@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org


On 05/28/2015 11:16 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/27/15 7:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> The man page does not clearly state that pg_dump will not dump things
>> like users or roles. It does mention briefly in the notes section that
>> pg_dumpall is needed for items that are set via SET but that isn't very
>> clear on the other items.
>
> How about this patch?
>

I would change the word save to backup but other than that, looks good.

JD

>
>
>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs