Message-ID: <557CDDE6.2010808@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:50:30 -0400
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
 pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch
References: <55665072.9020409@commandprompt.com> <55675B81.8030109@gmx.net>
 <55676C09.6070506@commandprompt.com>
In-Reply-To: <55676C09.6070506@commandprompt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

On 5/28/15 3:27 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> On 05/28/2015 11:16 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/27/15 7:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> The man page does not clearly state that pg_dump will not dump things
>>> like users or roles. It does mention briefly in the notes section that
>>> pg_dumpall is needed for items that are set via SET but that isn't very
>>> clear on the other items.
>>
>> How about this patch?
>>
> 
> I would change the word save to backup but other than that, looks good.

committed


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs