Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCxYr-0001i6-4i for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 22:11:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCxYp-0000mF-Tk for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 22:11:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCxYO-0000Oy-JJ for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 22:10:56 +0000 Received: from 01.zmailcloud.com ([192.198.85.104] helo=mx-out-1.zmailcloud.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCxYL-0006l2-11 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 22:10:55 +0000 Received: from smtp.01.com (smtp.01.com [10.10.0.43]) by mx-out-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AC25643D2 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:10:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6B4601A7 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:10:51 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9Q9Fvup2RRD for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:10:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp.01.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8A3602C8 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:10:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9234602BE for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:10:50 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id uapwyYmUNHps for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:10:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [172.47.23.104] (50-0-190-244.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.190.244]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 872BE601A7 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:10:50 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <559D9FE6.7030704@agliodbs.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 15:10:46 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Organization: PostgreSQL Experts Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Outdated note about unique indexes References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org > That note has been there forever, in particular since before we > supported CONCURRENTLY, which is pretty darn important in many uses > nowadays. Since it seems like some users have taken this suggestion > seriously, e.g. on stackoverflow[1], how about we remove this outdated > suggestion? There is already a previous mention a few sections > earlier[2] suggesting the use of CONCURRENTLY, so I don't think we > really need to reiterate that suggestion here. +1 -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs