X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F5A9FB2B2
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:30:06 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 80660-09 for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:30:02 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166059FB1F1
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:30:01 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7L3U0uC000568;
	Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:30:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: Taiki Yamaguchi <yamaguti@sra.co.jp>
cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: boolean type cast 
In-reply-to: <44E91BD9.6010806@sra.co.jp> 
References: <44E91BD9.6010806@sra.co.jp>
Comments: In-reply-to Taiki Yamaguchi <yamaguti@sra.co.jp>
	message dated "Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:35:05 +0900"
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:30:00 -0400
Message-ID: <567.1156131000@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.166 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL,
	SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200608/39
X-Sequence-Number: 3657

Taiki Yamaguchi <yamaguti@sra.co.jp> writes:
> I found a minor glitch in the documentation for 8.1 where it talks about
> boolean data type.

Yeah, looks like we missed updating that bit :-(

I'm tempted to just delete the whole <tip>.  Is there a reason to insert
some other text in its place?  If so, what to say?

			regards, tom lane