Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FC1476DC5 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 20:04:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30B2476D8B for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 20:04:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0314P0U005748; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 20:04:25 -0500 (EST) To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Lamar Owen , Joe Conway , Peter Eisentraut , "" Subject: Re: Documentation in book length In-reply-to: <20030102205943.U40620@hub.org> References: <3E14C75A.90700@joeconway.com> <5134.1041550327@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200301021841.23651.lamar.owen@wgcr.org> <20030102205943.U40620@hub.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Marc G. Fournier" message dated "Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:00:04 -0400" Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 20:04:25 -0500 Message-ID: <5747.1041555865@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200301/8 X-Sequence-Number: 1608 "Marc G. Fournier" writes: >> http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/ >> >> See the links on the left under 'RHDB 2.1 Documentation'. > they look like our docs ... what is different? They *are* our docs, just rearranged a bit. I don't recall the details of what was done, but comparing the tables of contents would probably show you most of the work. regards, tom lane