X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98699DCA11 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:19:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20255-10-4 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:19:19 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054789DCA28 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:19:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0J1JG5e005897; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:19:16 -0500 (EST) To: "Jim C. Nasby" cc: Scott Marlowe , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: vacuum and routine maintenance docs In-reply-to: <20060119011422.GM17896@pervasive.com> References: <1137518049.25500.27.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <20060117224941.GI17896@pervasive.com> <1137538769.25500.49.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <20060118221951.GT17896@pervasive.com> <1137626008.25500.90.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <5713.1137632107@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060119011422.GM17896@pervasive.com> Comments: In-reply-to "Jim C. Nasby" message dated "Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:14:22 -0600" Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:19:16 -0500 Message-ID: <5896.1137633556@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.092 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092] X-Spam-Score: 0.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/39 X-Sequence-Number: 3429 "Jim C. Nasby" writes: > I'm wondering if people feel this is an issue with the docs in general > and isn't limited to just the admin stuff? Probably, but the admin stuff seems to suffer worst. In any case, Scott volunteered to look at redoing that part, and I'm not going to repay the offer by asking him to redo the whole manual ;-) regards, tom lane