Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37B31337B51
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  3 Nov 2010 11:38:37 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 38587-04 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  3 Nov 2010 14:38:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1611337B43
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed,  3 Nov 2010 11:38:29 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oA3EcSYE005984;
	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:38:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>,
	pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Large SGML Cleanup 
In-reply-to: <1288788816-sup-8169@alvh.no-ip.org> 
References: <AANLkTi=1Sm9N3Khiued9UiMfdd_TKLimMiO9mCfHtL39@mail.gmail.com>
	<1288788816-sup-8169@alvh.no-ip.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
	message dated "Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:14:47 -0300"
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:38:28 -0400
Message-ID: <5983.1288795108@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201011/12
X-Sequence-Number: 6210

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I wonder if it would be better to see about switching the toolchain.

We certainly seem to be pushing the limits of the existing toolchain
... but are there any genuinely better alternatives out there?

			regards, tom lane