Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNGdX-0008KD-Ko for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:29:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNGdW-0003v4-IQ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:29:46 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNGdW-0003ux-CU for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:29:46 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNGdU-0008CL-6i for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:29:45 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08TETJWp609804; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:29:19 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Pavel Stehule cc: niels@thinkiq.com, Pg Docs Subject: Re: Version 13 documentation layout is harder to read than version 12 In-reply-to: References: <160135280918.659.8300614023795573502@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <608344.1601387551@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Pavel Stehule message dated "Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:01:59 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <609802.1601389759.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:29:19 -0400 Message-ID: <609803.1601389759@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Pavel Stehule writes: > the new layout is probably better, but I miss some gentle separation of > these three parts - maybe using a different font? Hm? If you mean synopsis vs. description vs. examples, the description already is a different font from the other two. I recall that we did experiment with extra vertical whitespace to separate, but abandoned that, possibly because controlling it was too painful with DocBook. regards, tom lane