Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 23:08:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
To: Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig@gmail.com>, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Message-ID: <63158593.42022.1670018891326@office.mailbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <2133999369.41448.1670016807570@office.mailbox.org>
References: 
 <CABR8q__QVKFzaUdQQsyU2wd2TZX1tdv7Q8M5myQ8L=BDDAtjLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <2133999369.41448.1670016807570@office.mailbox.org>
Subject: Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/63158593.42022.1670018891326%40office.mailbox.org>
Precedence: bulk

> On 02/12/2022 22:33 CET Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> wrote:
> 
>  
> > On 02/12/2022 21:51 CET Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody ever encountered this, and if so, did you find a resolution?
> > Or perhaps there other limitations with the VTU that I'm unaware of?
> 
> Is the one view you cannot find in view_table_usage a materialized view?
> Because those are not covered by view_table_usage[1].
> 
> [1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/catalog/information_schema.sql;h=18725a02d1fb6ffda3d218033b972a0ff23aac3b;hb=HEAD#l2605

Never mind.  I forgot that you wrote that it appears in pg_views.  So it's a plain view.

--
Erik