Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNmge-0001rS-Ar for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:43:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNmgd-0000W4-ED for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:43:39 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNmgb-0000Vt-JI for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:43:37 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XNmgS-0005Kt-RU for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:43:36 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7UHhQ90006439; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:43:26 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Kevin Grittner cc: Marti Raudsepp , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various documentation typo/grammar fixes In-reply-to: <1409416383.3283.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1408994031.21717.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1409003998.48777.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1409416383.3283.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Comments: In-reply-to Kevin Grittner message dated "Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:33:03 -0700" Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:43:26 -0400 Message-ID: <6438.1409420606@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Kevin Grittner writes: > Patch 1 pushed, with each fix back-patched as far as the error > exists in supported releases.  I held off on patch 2 -- partly > because I spotted at least one case where things weren't quite > right, partly because there's so much I haven't had time to go over > it in sufficient detail, and partly because commas are omitted so > consistently where most style guides want them that I thought > someone might want to argue that this was an intentional style > choice and should be preserved. I would argue against applying patch 2 at all. I think it's what John McIntyre (http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/language-blog/) would call peeverism. If there are any places where the extra commas/periods actually add anything to clarity, then sure, change those places --- but doing it only because some style guide tells you to is not the way to approach the issue. We're writing English not C code here, and so there is no single standard of correctness. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs